The fairy tale, by its very nature, is a living document. For centuries, folklore has shifted shape to reflect the values, anxieties, and political climates of the eras in which it was told. However, in the modern digital age, altering a beloved narrative can trigger a swift and polarizing response.
This dynamic was put on full display following Netflix’s release of the first teaser trailer for Steps, an upcoming animated musical comedy produced by Netflix Animation Studios and Amy Poehler’s Paper Kite Productions. Soundtracked by Charli XCX’s hyper-pop anthem "Mean Girls," the teaser offers a highly stylized, satirical spin on the classic Cinderella story. Rather than focusing on the titular heroine, the film centers on her traditionally "evil" stepsisters, Lilith and Margot, reimagining them as misunderstood young women navigating a society obsessed with rigid moral binaries and superficial perfection.
While the project boasts a prestigious creative pedigree and a star-studded voice cast, its revisionist approach has ignited a fiery debate across social media. Traditionalists have decried the film as an unnecessary subversion of a classic, with some critics on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) going so far as to label the movie a "satanic inversion" of the classic Disney narrative. Conversely, cultural historians and animation enthusiasts argue that Steps is merely continuing a centuries-old tradition of folklore adaptation.
Main Facts: The Creative Vision Behind ‘Steps’
Steps is positioned as a cornerstone of Netflix’s upcoming slate of original animated features. The film represents a collaborative effort between Netflix Animation and Paper Kite Productions, the production company founded by actress and producer Amy Poehler, known for championing character-driven, female-led comedic narratives.
The Creative Team and Cast
The film is co-directed by Alyce Tzue and John Ripa. Tzue is an acclaimed animator who previously won a Student Academy Award Gold Medal for her short film Soar. Ripa brings extensive industry experience to the project, having served as a co-director on Disney’s Raya and the Last Dragon and worked as an animator on classics such as Tarzan, Hercules, and Zootopia.
The voice cast features an ensemble of high-profile talent across comedy, drama, and theater:
- Ali Wong and Stephanie Hsu voice the reimagined stepsisters, Lilith and Margot.
- Amanda Seyfried lends her voice to Cinderella.
- Daniel Radcliffe and Bette Midler round out the supporting cast in undisclosed but prominent roles.
The Premise
Rather than presenting the stepsisters as naturally malicious, Steps frames them as complex, flawed, and deeply misunderstood individuals. The narrative questions the absolute moral authority of the traditional Cinderella figure, suggesting that history is written by the victors—or, in this case, the princess who fits the slipper. The musical elements, combined with a contemporary satirical tone, seek to deconstruct the fairy-tale tropes that have dominated Western media for nearly a century.
Chronology: The Fluid History of ‘Cinderella’
To understand the controversy surrounding Steps, it is necessary to examine the historical evolution of the Cinderella narrative. The idea of a "definitive" version of the story is a modern construct, largely popularized by the mid-20th-century hegemony of Walt Disney Productions. In reality, the tale has existed in various cultures for millennia, constantly shifting in tone, morality, and character development.
[Antiquity] Rhodopis (Egypt/Greece) -> First recorded shoe-test motif
│
[9th Century] Ye Xian (China) -> Introduction of the magical benefactor (fish bones)
│
[1634] La Gatta Cenerentola (Italy) -> Heroine murders her first stepmother
│
[1697] Cendrillon (France - Perrault) -> Introduces fairy godmother, pumpkin, glass slipper
│
[1812] Aschenputtel (Germany - Grimm) -> Darker tone; stepsisters mutilate feet; blinded by birds
│
[1950] Cinderella (Disney) -> Standardized moral binary; talking animals; simplified ending
│
[2020s] Steps (Netflix) -> Satirical shift to the stepsisters' perspective
1. Antiquity: The Greco-Egyptian Origins
The earliest recorded ancestor of the Cinderella story is the tale of Rhodopis, recorded by the Greek geographer Strabo in the first century BC. In this version, a Greek slave girl living in Egypt has her gilded sandal stolen by an eagle, which drops it into the lap of the Pharaoh in Memphis. Enchanted by the shape of the shoe, the Pharaoh launches a search across the kingdom, eventually finding Rhodopis and marrying her. This ancient iteration lacked the stepfamily dynamic entirely, focusing instead on divine intervention and destiny.
2. The Tang Dynasty: Ye Xian
By the ninth century AD, the Chinese story of Ye Xian introduced the stepfamily element. In this version, the protagonist is mistreated by her stepmother after her father’s death. Ye Xian befriends a magical fish with golden eyes, which her stepmother subsequently kills and cooks. The fish’s bones retain magical properties, helping Ye Xian secure a beautiful gown and golden shoes to attend a local festival.

3. The Renaissance: Basile’s Dark Italian Turn
In 1634, Giambattista Basile published La Gatta Cenerentola (The Cinderella Cat) in Italy. This version presents a highly morally ambiguous heroine. The protagonist, Zezolla, is persuaded by her governess to murder her first stepmother by dropping the heavy lid of a wooden chest onto her neck. Zezolla then helps her governess marry her father, only for the governess to bring forward six of her own hidden daughters, relegating Zezolla to the kitchen. This version highlights a cycle of betrayal and violence far removed from the passive innocence of modern interpretations.
4. The French Refinement: Charles Perrault (1697)
The version of the story most familiar to Western audiences was penned by Charles Perrault in his 1697 collection Histoires ou contes du temps passé. Perrault introduced the iconic elements of the fairy godmother, the pumpkin carriage, and the glass slippers. Notably, Perrault’s ending is highly forgiving: after Cinderella marries the prince, she forgives her stepsisters, brings them to live in the palace, and marries them off to noble lords of the court.
5. The Brothers Grimm: Aschenputtel (1812)
In stark contrast to Perrault’s gentle moralizing, the German version collected by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm in 1812 returned to a darker, more punitive narrative. In Aschenputtel, there is no fairy godmother; instead, a hazel tree planted on her mother’s grave grants her wishes. To fit the golden slipper, one stepsister cuts off her big toe, and the other slices off her heel, encouraged by their mother who notes, "When you are Queen, you will no longer need to go on foot." Their deception is exposed by royal pigeons, who later peck out the stepsisters’ eyes at Cinderella’s wedding, condemning them to a lifetime of blindness for their wickedness.
6. The Disney Era (1950) and Direct-to-Video Redemption
Walt Disney’s 1950 animated masterpiece codified the story for the modern era, simplifying the moral binary to save his studio from impending bankruptcy. Disney omitted the physical mutilation of the Grimm version but also removed Perrault’s ending of forgiveness, leaving the stepfamily’s fate unresolved in the original film.
Interestingly, Disney itself began the trend of humanizing the stepsisters decades before Netflix. In the direct-to-video sequels Cinderella II: Dreams Come True (2002) and Cinderella III: A Twist in Time (2007), the stepsister Anastasia Tremaine is given a comprehensive redemption arc. She falls in love with a humble baker—defying her mother’s demands for status—and eventually uses the fairy godmother’s wand to undo her mother’s evil spells, earning Cinderella’s forgiveness.
Supporting Data: The Market Viability of Sympathetic Villains
The decision by Netflix and Paper Kite Productions to center their film on the stepsisters is not merely an artistic whim; it is backed by a decade of highly lucrative industry data. Modern audiences have demonstrated a consistent and powerful appetite for narratives that deconstruct classic villains and challenge traditional moral binaries.
| Project Title | Release Year | Format | Core Concept | Financial / Critical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wicked | 2003 (Stage) / 2024 (Film) | Musical | Reimagining of the Wicked Witch of the West (The Wizard of Oz) | Over $1.5 billion in stage grosses; highly anticipated cinematic adaptation. |
| Maleficent | 2014 | Live-Action Film | Reimagining of the villain from Sleeping Beauty | Grossed $758.5 million worldwide; spawned a sequel in 2019. |
| Cruella | 2021 | Live-Action Film | Origin story of the puppy-snatching villain from 101 Dalmatians | Grossed $233.5 million (during pandemic limitations); won an Academy Award for Costume Design. |
| Nimona | 2023 | Animated Film | Subversion of the traditional knight vs. monster trope | Academy Award nomination for Best Animated Feature (Netflix). |
This shift in consumer behavior indicates that audiences are increasingly fatigued by flat, black-and-white characterizations. Psychological complexity, trauma-informed backstories, and the exploration of societal pressures have replaced simple "born evil" tropes as preferred storytelling devices.
Official Responses and Public Reaction
The release of the Steps teaser trailer has exposed a deep ideological divide within the contemporary cultural landscape. The reaction on social media platforms, particularly X, has been swift and intensely divided.
The Conservative and Traditionalist Backlash
A vocal segment of the online audience has reacted with hostility to the teaser, viewing it as an assault on traditional storytelling and childhood nostalgia. Critics have accused Netflix of participating in a broader cultural trend of moral relativism, where traditional concepts of good and evil are systematically inverted.
Common criticisms posted online include:

- The "Satanic Inversion" Accusation: Some users argued that by framing traditionally wicked characters as good, the film promotes a worldview where "good is evil and evil is good," calling it a "satanic inversion" of classic moral lessons.
- Nostalgia Protection: Others expressed frustration over the perceived destruction of childhood memories, arguing that the classic Disney dynamics should remain untouched. One user mockingly predicted: "Coming soon, a Netflix series about how Buffalo Bill [from Silence of the Lambs] was just misunderstood."
- The "Woke" Critique: The label of "peak wokeness" was frequently applied, with detractors claiming the film prioritizes modern sociopolitical messaging over timeless storytelling.
The Defense of Folklore and Satire
Conversely, historians, animators, and defenders of the project have pointed out the historical ignorance of the backlash. They argue that folklore has always been a medium for subversion and adaptation.
- Oral Tradition Argument: Defenders note that because fairy tales originate from oral traditions, there is no "pure" or "correct" version. Disney’s 1950 film was itself a highly sanitized, Americanized adaptation of a French text, which was in turn an adaptation of older European and Asian folktales.
- The Satirical Tradition: Many have pointed out that satirical takedowns of fairy tales are a beloved subgenre in their own right, pointing to the massive critical and commercial success of DreamWorks’ Shrek franchise, which built its entire brand on mocking Disney tropes.
Implications: The Future of Animation and Public Domain IP
The controversy surrounding Steps carries significant implications for the entertainment industry, particularly regarding how studios utilize public domain intellectual property (IP) and how they position themselves in an increasingly competitive streaming market.
1. The Low-Risk, High-Reward Nature of Public Domain IP
As major studios face rising production costs and audience fatigue with traditional superhero franchises, public domain properties—such as the stories of the Brothers Grimm, Hans Christian Andersen, and Lewis Carroll—have become incredibly valuable.
- They carry zero licensing fees.
- They possess universal brand recognition.
- They allow for limitless creative interpretation.
By taking a well-known story like Cinderella and applying a modern, satirical lens, Netflix can capture the attention of audiences who are already familiar with the basic premise, while offering enough of a twist to justify its existence.
2. Netflix’s Strategy in the Animation Wars
Netflix Animation has spent the last several years positioning itself as a bolder, more stylistically diverse alternative to Disney and Pixar. While Disney has faced criticism for playing it safe with live-action remakes of its own animated catalog, Netflix has taken creative risks on projects like Guillermo del Toro’s Pinocchio (which won an Academy Award), Nimona, and Klaus.
Steps fits perfectly into this strategy. By hiring directors like Alyce Tzue and John Ripa, and partnering with a sharp comedic voice like Amy Poehler, Netflix is attempting to appeal to older children, teenagers, and adults who appreciate sophisticated humor and revisionist storytelling.
3. The Fatigue of the "Sympathetic Villain" Trope
While the revisionist approach has been highly successful over the past decade, Steps arrives at a time when the "misunderstood villain" trope is itself facing criticism for becoming a creative cliché. If every villain is revealed to be a secret hero who was simply misunderstood, the narrative structure can become just as predictable as the traditional moral binaries it seeks to replace.
The ultimate success of Steps will depend on whether it can move beyond the basic premise of its subversion to deliver a genuinely heartfelt, funny, and visually compelling story. If it succeeds, it will cement its place in the long, proud history of Cinderella adaptations. If it fails, it may be remembered as a symptom of an industry overly reliant on deconstructing the past rather than building new myths for the future.

